8. Evaluation criteria and Grading System
Evaluation System |
Continuous assessment |
Non-continuous evaluation * |
Description |
Assessment of active participation |
10.00% |
0.00% |
|
Assessment of problem solving and/or case studies |
30.00% |
0.00% |
|
Test |
60.00% |
100.00% |
|
Total: |
100.00% |
100.00% |
|
According to art. 4 of the UCLM Student Evaluation Regulations, it must be provided to students who cannot regularly attend face-to-face training activities the passing of the subject, having the right (art. 12.2) to be globally graded, in 2 annual calls per subject , an ordinary and an extraordinary one (evaluating 100% of the competences).
Evaluation criteria for the final exam:
-
Continuous assessment:
- In the written test both the correctness in the answers, as well as the capacity for written expression and the capacity for synthesis will be assessed.
- The evaluation of the participation will be carried out taking into consideration both a continuous participation throughout the semester, as well as the capacity for oral expression and critical reasoning.
- In solving problems or cases, the ability to synthesize will be assessed as well as the ability to understand and critically assess the jurisprudence of the CJEU and Supreme Court.
-
Non-continuous evaluation:
Evaluation criteria of the ordinary call:
Continuous assessment:
The exam will consist of two parts, a theoretical one with short questions and a practical one in the style of the cases that will be proposed and discussed in the classes. In the practical part, compilations of standards (codes) may be used. In order to carry out the weighting of 70% (theory) and 30% (practice), it will be necessary to obtain at least a 4 in each of the two parts.
The clarity in the writing, the solidity of the argumentation and the correctness in the answers will be valued. Likewise, spelling or writing problems may lead to a failure in the subject.
Among the evaluation criteria, at least the following will be taken into account:
- Mastery of the subject, both in its theoretical and practical aspects.
- Ability to synthesize and correct command of the legal-administrative language.
- Clarity in the writing and argumentation of the practical cases.
- Oratory and adequate presentation in the debates generated in the course of the practical cases. In this regard, assistance with achievement and participation will be valued positively.
Non-continuous evaluation:
The exam will consist of two parts, a theoretical one with short questions and a practical one in the style of the cases that will be proposed and discussed in the classes. In the practical part, compilations of standards (codes) may be used. In order to carry out the weighting of 70% (theory) and 30% (practice), it will be necessary to obtain at least a 4 in each of the two parts.
The clarity in the writing, the solidity of the argumentation and the correctness in the answers will be valued. Likewise, spelling or writing problems may lead to a failure in the subject.
Specifications for the resit/retake exam:
- The qualifications corresponding to "assessment of participation with use in class" and "resolution of problems or cases" will be kept, provided they have been passed.
- In any case, an assessment alternative will be provided to those students who have not successfully passed the aforementioned assessment systems.
Specifications for the second resit / retake exam:
- The qualifications corresponding to "assessment of participation with use in class" and "resolution of problems or cases" will be kept, provided that they had been passed in the ordinary or extraordinary call of the immediately preceding year.
- In any case, an assessment alternative will be provided to those students who have not successfully passed the aforementioned assessment systems.