8. Evaluation criteria and Grading System
Evaluation System |
Continuous assessment |
Non-continuous evaluation * |
Description |
Assessment of problem solving and/or case studies |
30.00% |
0.00% |
The resolution of the practical cases proposed by the teacher throughout the course will have a value of up to 30% in the final grade. |
Final test |
20.00% |
100.00% |
Students who do not follow the continuous assessment will be examined in a final theoretical-practical test of all the contents of the course. |
Mid-term tests |
50.00% |
0.00% |
Several progress tests are planned throughout the course, which in the case of passing all of them, students will be exempted from taking a test of the whole subject. These tests will be worth up to 70% of the final grade. |
Total: |
100.00% |
100.00% |
|
According to art. 4 of the UCLM Student Evaluation Regulations, it must be provided to students who cannot regularly attend face-to-face training activities the passing of the subject, having the right (art. 12.2) to be globally graded, in 2 annual calls per subject , an ordinary and an extraordinary one (evaluating 100% of the competences).
Evaluation criteria for the final exam:
-
Continuous assessment:
On-site students will be assessed using the continuous assessment system. An "on-site student" is understood to be a student who completes all the practical exercises and progress tests planned during the course and attends class regularly. Failure to complete any of these practical exercises or progress tests entails the loss of the status of "on-site student", being assessed according to the system established for those students who have not been able to follow the continuous assessment system, who must take a theoretical test covering the entire syllabus of the subject.
Both in the continuous assessment system and for those students who could not follow it, the criteria to be followed by the teacher will be those detailed below:
- Mastery of the subject, both in its theoretical and practical aspects.
- Ability to synthesise and correct command of legal-financial language.
- Clarity in the writing and argumentation of practical cases.
-
Non-continuous evaluation:
Students who have not been able to follow the continuous assessment system or who have not passed the progress tests and practical cases established in this system will be examined in the non-continuous assessment.
Specifications for the resit/retake exam:
Theoretical-practical final test covering all the contents of the course.
Specifications for the second resit / retake exam:
Evaluation criteria not defined