8. Evaluation criteria and Grading System
Evaluation System |
Continuous assessment |
Non-continuous evaluation * |
Description |
Assessment of problem solving and/or case studies |
25.00% |
25.00% |
The information provided, work organization, writing, adequacy of tables/images/figures and bibliography will be evaluated. A presentation of the work in class will be made and the following will be evaluated: mastery of the subject, expression and vocabulary, body posture and eye contact, voice and supports. Written tests will also be done to evaluate key concepts of the problems/cases. |
Laboratory sessions |
7.00% |
7.00% |
Attitude, skill and knowledge are evaluated. |
Practicum and practical activities reports assessment |
8.00% |
8.00% |
Results obtained and the correctness of their presentation are evaluated. |
Progress Tests |
20.00% |
0.00% |
There will be progress tests. If a grade equal to or greater than 4 out of 10 is obtained this grade will count for 20% in the final grade for the subject. If the tests are not taken or are taken and a grade of less than 4 out of 10 is obtained, then the weight of the progress tests in the overall grade for the subject will be 0%, becoming 60% the weight of the final test in the final grade of the subject. |
Final test |
40.00% |
60.00% |
The final test will have a weight of 40% in the subject final grade if the progress tests have been passed with a grade equal to or greater than 4. If the progress tests are not carried out or are performed and a grade of less than 4 out of 10 is obtained, then the weight of the final test in the overall grade for the subject will be 60%. |
Total: |
100.00% |
100.00% |
|
According to art. 4 of the UCLM Student Evaluation Regulations, it must be provided to students who cannot regularly attend face-to-face training activities the passing of the subject, having the right (art. 12.2) to be globally graded, in 2 annual calls per subject , an ordinary and an extraordinary one (evaluating 100% of the competences).
Evaluation criteria for the final exam:
-
Continuous assessment:
The level of development of transversal and specific competences will be taken into account to evaluate the subject. In addition, participation in seminar classes will be considered.
Each activity will be gaded numerically, from 0 to 10.
To pass the subject, a minimum of 4 points must be obtained in each compulsory activity (final test, attitude in practices, practice report, report and oral presentation of the report).
In any case, the student will pass the subject if average of all evaluable activities results in a grade of 5 or higher (out of 10).
As it is a continuous evaluation, class attendance and participation in the different scheduled non-compulsory activities (seminars, technical visit to wastewater treatment facilities) are recommended.
The mode assigned by default to the student will be continuous assessment. Any student may request the change to the non-continuous evaluation modality (before the end of the class period) by sending an email to the teacher, provided that they have not completed 50% of the evaluable activities.
-
Non-continuous evaluation:
The level of development of the transversal and specific competences raised above will be taken into account to grade all the subject activities.
The qualification of each activity will be numerical, from 0 to 10.
To consider the student has passed the subject, a minimum of 4 points must be obtained in each compulsory activity (final test, attitude in practices, preparation of the practice report, written report and oral presentation of the report).
In any case, the subject will only be considered passed if the average of all evaluable activities results in a grade of 5 or higher (out of 10).
Specifications for the resit/retake exam:
In the case of not reaching 4 points in any of the compulsory activities, the student must take an exam of the activity or activities not passed during the ordinary call.
So:
- In the case of the final test, it will be a written exam of the same characteristics,
- in the case of carrying out the practices, a written exam on the content (fundamentals, experimental methods, treatment of results) of the practices,
- In the case of the practice report, the elaboration of a new report that corrects the errors that the previous one presented.
- in the case of the written report of theoretical works, it will be the elaboration of a new report that corrects the errors that the previous one presented,
- In the case of the oral presentation of the report, it is a new oral presentation that corrects the errors that the previous one had.
Specifications for the second resit / retake exam:
In the case of the call for special completion of the subject, the activities passed in the last call to which the student took part will be taken into account, carrying out only those that were not passed.