8. Evaluation criteria and Grading System
Evaluation System |
Continuous assessment |
Non-continuous evaluation * |
Description |
Projects |
100.00% |
100.00% |
|
Total: |
100.00% |
100.00% |
|
According to art. 4 of the UCLM Student Evaluation Regulations, it must be provided to students who cannot regularly attend face-to-face training activities the passing of the subject, having the right (art. 12.2) to be globally graded, in 2 annual calls per subject , an ordinary and an extraordinary one (evaluating 100% of the competences).
Evaluation criteria for the final exam:
-
Continuous assessment:
The End of Degree Work will be evaluated by a court of three members, of which at least two will be teachers belonging to the different Chemistry Areas. The Guardian shall issue an assessment report of the End of Degree Work that will be submitted to the court and authorize the presentation of the same to the court (essential prerequisite). The court's Assessment of End of Degree Work will have a score of between 0 and 10 points. The whole of this evaluation will be considered:
- The academic training acquired by the student (2 points out of 10).
- Scientific rigor and the quality of the work carried out (3 points out of 10).
- Exposure clarity (3 points out of 10).
- The capacity for debate and defence of arguments (2 points out of 10).
-
Non-continuous evaluation:
The End of Degree Work will be evaluated by a court of three members, of which at least two will be teachers belonging to the different Chemistry Areas. The Guardian shall issue an assessment report of the End of Degree Work that will be submitted to the court and authorize the presentation of the same to the court (essential prerequisite). The court's Assessment of End of Degree Work will have a score of between 0 and 10 points. The whole of this evaluation will be considered:
- The academic training acquired by the student (2 points out of 10).
- Scientific rigor and the quality of the work carried out (3 points out of 10).
- Exposure clarity (3 points out of 10).
- The capacity for debate and defence of arguments (2 points out of 10).
Specifications for the resit/retake exam:
Evaluation criteria not defined
Specifications for the second resit / retake exam:
Evaluation criteria not defined